SEO Duplicate Content Fee Myth Erupted

The 'duplicate content fee' fantasy is one of many biggest obstacles I face in getting internet professionals to embrace re-print content. The myth is that search engines will penalize a site if much of its material can also be on other websites. Clarification: there's a real identical content charge for content that is replicated with small or no variation throughout the pages of one site. There's also a 'reflection' punishment for a site that's pretty much greatly reproducing yet another individual site. What I am speaking about this is actually the re-print of pages of material separately, rather than in a mass, on multiple sites. Yet another clarification: 'charge' is just a loaded concept in testtest. 'Penalty' means that search engines will punish a website for violations of the engine's terms of service. The punishment often means rendering it not as likely that the site will appear searching results. Abuse also can indicate elimination from the search engine's index of web pages (' de-indexing' or 'de-listing '). How have I increased the 'duplicate information punishment' fantasy? * PageRank. Many thousands of high-PageRank internet sites reprint content and supply content for reprint. The most obvious case is the news-wires such as Reuters (PR 8) and the Associated Press (PR 9) that re-print to internet sites such as (PR 10). * The expansion of information publishing sites. These day there are hundreds of sites devoted to re-print information because it is a inexpensive, simple magnet for web traffic, particularly search engine traffic. * Experience. I've seen considerable se traffic both from distributing content to be reprinted and from reprinting content on the webpage. How I Doubled Se Traffic with Reprint Content When I first began distributing content for my primary site, I was shocked by the highly-targeted traffic I got from visitors hitting the link at the end-of the report. Se traffic also slowly increased equally from the links and from having content on the site. But I was a lot more stunned with the internet search engine traffic I got when I began putting reprint articles on the site in September. I had written a significant number of reprint articles for clients and gathered several webmaster 'fans' who looked out for my articles to reprint them. I desired to allow it to be easier in order for them to find most of the publishing articles I'd prepared. I did not need to bring an excessive amount of focus on these articles, which had nothing regarding the key subject of the site, web content. So I secluded the articles in one single area of your website. The posts got an astonishing number of search engine traffic. The traffic was overwhelmingly from Google, and for long multiple-word research strings that just happened to be in this article word for word. Why was I surprised with the internet search engine traffic? 1. The posts had therefore little link popularity. The link recognition to the articles came largely from an individual link to the 'reprint information' page from the homepage, which linked to group pages, which linked to the articles themselves--three presses from the homepage. The sitemap was tremendous, above 100 links, so its Page-rank contribution was small. Since these articles were on the webpage this kind of short-time I strongly doubt they got any links from other sites. 2. The posts had therefore much competition. These articles were published much more widely compared to average reprint post, that will be fortunate if it makes it into a few dedicated reprint websites. As part of my support I had done most of the groundwork of re-printing my customers' articles for them. In fact, I assure at the very least 100 reprints on Google-indexed website pages possibly for every single report or number of articles. So that is up to 100 web pages, often more, that were competing with my web page to appear in search engine effects for the search string. Why Do Re-print Articles Get Internet Search Engine Traffic? You'd feel Google would just pick one website with the article because the authoritative model and deliver all the traffic to it. But that's maybe not how Google works. Each of the se's look at facets beyond just this content on line page. They take a look at links. Bing, at least, promises to appear at 100 facets total. Many of these must connect with the information on the site, but not them all. The whole experience has given me great insight in to what elements Google uses along with what we would think about the page itself, and the relative importance of each. * Web-page titles (the main one in the html title label) are really crucial as tie-breakers between two otherwise equally matched pages. Many reprinters waste the title, utilising the article title while the web site title. Set yourself apart by creating special five-to-ten-word web-page titles including goal keywords. * Content tweaks. You can even introduce the article with a distinctive, keyword-laden editor's notice, and end the article off with some keyword-laced comments. * Intra-site link recognition and point text (that's, for links to the article page from other webpages on the site) are also important. If you're able to not link to the page from the homepage, keep it as close to the homepage as possible and weed out extraneous links (take to placing all your site plans for a passing fancy page). Re-print articles, such as the internet search engine traffic they provide, cost nothing. Don't look something special horse in the mouth. Forget the 'duplicate content penalty.' Be in on content reprints and share the search engine wealth.